Pricing sustainable products brings up a question I hear constantly: what do you do when there’s nothing out there to compare your price to? No obvious competitor, no clear market price to anchor against — just the sense that you’re setting a price in the dark.

And then you put that price in front of customers. Some push back on the number. Some even tell you the product should cost less because it’s sustainable.

And those aren’t the only complications. The value isn’t always easy to demonstrate, particularly when the benefits show up later. And if you’re selling through a channel, you’re not necessarily making the same value argument to everyone involved.

In this episode we look at:

• Why “there’s nothing to compare to” might be telling you something about how you’re pricing, not just about your market
• How sustainability itself can complicate the value and pricing conversation
• Why selling through a channel changes what you need to demonstrate as value, and to whom

Listen to the full episode.

---

A QUICK NOTE: If pricing challenges are showing up in your business right now, it’s often a sign that pricing needs structure — not another tweak. Here’s more about how I work with clients to give them clarity.

---

Episode Summary

Why Pricing Sustainable Products Feels So Hard

Founders building sustainability-based businesses tend to arrive at the same place: pricing feels like guesswork, done in the dark, with nothing solid to check it against. That reaction is common enough to take seriously — but not in the way most founders take it. The instinct is to conclude that a harder pricing problem needs a different pricing method. It doesn’t. The obstacles are real. The conclusion drawn from them usually isn’t.

The One-Legged Pricing Strategy

The obstacle that comes up most is the absence of a clean comparison point. There’s no obvious competitor to benchmark against, so competitive pricing, the thing most founders lean on by default, offers nothing concrete to compare to.

If that’s your reaction, it’s worth asking what it reveals about how you’ve been pricing, not just about your market. If competitor comparison is the main input into your price, and you don’t have a competitor, the whole approach collapses. The fix isn’t a better competitor. It’s building the other legs — cost, value, willingness to pay — so the decision doesn’t depend on one input that happens to be missing.

And it’s worth questioning the thought itself: there’s usually something to compare to, once you stop restricting the search to direct competitors and consider indirect ones too.

Value That’s Hard to Pin Down

The second obstacle is quantifying value. Sustainable products often deliver benefits that are delayed or not obvious at the moment of purchase — durability that only shows up over time, for instance, rather than at the point of decision.

This isn’t unique to sustainability. Most businesses find value hard to quantify precisely, and have to make assumptions somewhere in the process, sustainable product or not. The assumptions still need to be made, and they still need to be tested against what the customer actually experiences and cares about.

The Channel Complication

There’s a fourth wrinkle for founders selling B2B through a channel rather than direct to end users: the value arguments that work with your end user aren’t necessarily the ones that matter to the partner deciding whether to carry you. Channel partners typically work on thin margins, and the case for carrying a pricier option has to land on whatever actually drives their decision — which isn’t automatically the same thing that drives the end user’s.

That doesn’t make the end-user value work wasted. Those same arguments can still help the channel sell to the end user later — they just aren’t necessarily what gets the channel to say yes to carrying you in the first place. The two cases need to be built separately, for two different decisions.

The Fundamentals Don’t Change

None of this points to a different pricing method. It means you may need to be more rigorous in how you apply it. Customers are still buying based on the value they expect — sustainable product or not — and that’s still what determines what you can charge.

Price setting starts in the same place it always does: understand the customer(s), be clear about the offer, understand its value to that customer, and check it against the market and your cost and profit picture. The context is different. The starting point isn’t.

Applying This to Your Business

Get clear on who you’re selling to and how they decide — through actual customer interviews, across every segment, including a channel if you have one. Stop looking for a pricing method built specifically for sustainability, because there isn’t one to find; the fundamentals just need to be applied with more care in a context that’s genuinely more demanding. Let the price reflect how value actually gets delivered, rather than defaulting to how the industry usually prices. And if you sell through a channel, build that case on its own terms, separately from the case you’d make to an end user.

Listen to the full episode.

---

---

Episode Links

Watch the episode on Youtube

Episode FAQ

Q: Why is it harder to price a sustainable product?

It usually comes down to three things: there’s rarely a clean competitor to benchmark against, the value can be delayed or hard to quantify, and founders tend to assume sustainability matters to the customer as much as it matters to them, which isn’t always true. None of these make the pricing process fundamentally different. They mean the standard fundamentals — understanding the customer, the value, and the cost picture — need to be applied more carefully.

Q: Should a sustainable product cost more than a conventional alternative?

Not automatically, in either direction. Cost can go either way depending on the effort required to produce the product, and value can go either way depending on what benefits the customer actually experiences and cares about. The price should reflect your specific cost and value picture, not an assumption that “sustainable” means “premium” or means “cheaper”.

Q: How should I price differently when I sell through a channel instead of directly to customers?

Build the case separately. The value that convinces an end user to buy isn’t necessarily what convinces a channel partner to carry you — partners are typically working on thin margins, so the case has to work on their terms. That doesn’t make the end-user value work wasted: those same arguments can still help the channel sell to end users later, just not in the initial decision to carry you. You need to understand both the end user and the channel, but build separate cases for each.